- Joined
- Dec 10, 2023
- Posts
- 2,484
- Reaction score
- 3,040
- Points
- 12,220
- Location
- Kwangya
- Plus Coins
- ⨭3,290,650
- Pronouns
- She/Her
Howdy Howdy
I don't even know what to call this? But dispatch released an article about the trial.
The article states Ador submitted 230 pages of evidence on their defense and NJZ submitted about 90 pages of evidence on their defense.
Here is the article source.
I tried to cut down on the color coding so right now it's:
Orange is Hybe. Blue is NJZ. Purple is some side context from me.
I also want to disclaim in advance, this dispatch article definitely is Ador-favoring. Since it gave a summary of both sides I wanted to share it, but I also just want to call out in advance this article definitely is leaning more towards Ador.
I also want to shout out that as we've previously seen in this trial so far, Ador seems to mostly be going after MHJ and blaming them for most things. Their angle still is that MHJ is manipulating the girls and this is MHJ's fault.
There were 10 topics discussed in the trial in which I will be breaking up into 2 posts to not make this too long. This post will be parts 1-5, the next post will be parts 6-10.
I don't even know what to call this? But dispatch released an article about the trial.
The article states Ador submitted 230 pages of evidence on their defense and NJZ submitted about 90 pages of evidence on their defense.
Here is the article source.
I tried to cut down on the color coding so right now it's:
Orange is Hybe. Blue is NJZ. Purple is some side context from me.
I also want to disclaim in advance, this dispatch article definitely is Ador-favoring. Since it gave a summary of both sides I wanted to share it, but I also just want to call out in advance this article definitely is leaning more towards Ador.
I also want to shout out that as we've previously seen in this trial so far, Ador seems to mostly be going after MHJ and blaming them for most things. Their angle still is that MHJ is manipulating the girls and this is MHJ's fault.
There were 10 topics discussed in the trial in which I will be breaking up into 2 posts to not make this too long. This post will be parts 1-5, the next post will be parts 6-10.
1. Ignoring Incident
NJZ
The manager of Belift Labs told the members of Illit to "ignore and pass by" in front of Hanni. An incident where a manager from the same agency, Hybe, ostracized and harassed Hanni. Three members of Illit passed by Hanni without greeting her. Some members mocked Hanni with their words and actions.
Ador
Hanni revealed to MHJ that all three members of Illit greeted her. It wasn't Hanni who said (that the manager said), "Ignore me," but MHJ who said it first. When asked, "Did your manager tell you not to greet me?", Hanni replied, "I don't know." This is a false excuse to create a reason to terminate her exclusive contract.
NJZ
It has been confirmed that there were videos in which the three members of illit did not greet each other, and that they were not even kept. The videos must have been selectively deleted and kept under the orders of Kim Joo-young and Lee Jae-sang. Shouldn't they find the people involved, confirm the facts, apologize, and prevent recurrence? I wonder why they aren't taking the obvious measures.
Ador
We have never deleted it, and there is no reason to delete it. I don't think it is a big issue for me (us?) either, and it is an issue that can be resolved by checking the video and calling both parties. Why would Hybe delete the video?
NJZ
The manager of Belift Labs told the members of Illit to "ignore and pass by" in front of Hanni. An incident where a manager from the same agency, Hybe, ostracized and harassed Hanni. Three members of Illit passed by Hanni without greeting her. Some members mocked Hanni with their words and actions.
Ador
Hanni revealed to MHJ that all three members of Illit greeted her. It wasn't Hanni who said (that the manager said), "Ignore me," but MHJ who said it first. When asked, "Did your manager tell you not to greet me?", Hanni replied, "I don't know." This is a false excuse to create a reason to terminate her exclusive contract.
NJZ
It has been confirmed that there were videos in which the three members of illit did not greet each other, and that they were not even kept. The videos must have been selectively deleted and kept under the orders of Kim Joo-young and Lee Jae-sang. Shouldn't they find the people involved, confirm the facts, apologize, and prevent recurrence? I wonder why they aren't taking the obvious measures.
Ador
We have never deleted it, and there is no reason to delete it. I don't think it is a big issue for me (us?) either, and it is an issue that can be resolved by checking the video and calling both parties. Why would Hybe delete the video?
2. 뉴아르 (New-A-Reu)
For some background context: This part is regarding part of the hybe documents leaks when hybe mentioned "뉴아르" As the three leading girl groups of the current gen of kpop. People were fighting over what girl groups each character was supposed to represent. People sort of knew the first character was for New Jeans and the last one was for Le Sserafim, so the main argument was what the "아" character was supposed to represent. Some people thought this meant Aespa, NJZ thought this meant Illit, Hybe is arguing this stood for Ive.
NJZ
The fact that Hybe's music industry report on May 10, 2023 states that they will drop the 'New' in "뉴아르" (New Jeans, Illit, Le Seraphim) is interpreted as a plan to drop New Jeans and start over.
Ador
The '아' in "뉴아르" is not Illit, but Ive. At the time the document was written, Illit had not even debuted. It started from a clear misunderstanding of facts. The opinion was that it would be better to avoid categorizing News Jeans and Le Sserafim and categorize them with other girl groups (Blackpink, Aespa, Ive).
NJZ
Isn't there a plan to somehow exclude New Jeans from the category of representative 4th generation girl groups and include Le Sserafim? In fact, they launched Illit that imitated New Jeans and implemented a plan to damage and replace the New Jeans brand value.
Ador
The author is not the decision maker and this is just a personal opinion, not a decision-making document at the Hybe level. On October 24, 2024, 1 year and 5 months after the report was written, someone read the report more than 7 times. The person who read it was MHJ. I would like to ask whether it is not a bigger problem to maliciously edit and distort the meaning.
For some background context: This part is regarding part of the hybe documents leaks when hybe mentioned "뉴아르" As the three leading girl groups of the current gen of kpop. People were fighting over what girl groups each character was supposed to represent. People sort of knew the first character was for New Jeans and the last one was for Le Sserafim, so the main argument was what the "아" character was supposed to represent. Some people thought this meant Aespa, NJZ thought this meant Illit, Hybe is arguing this stood for Ive.
NJZ
The fact that Hybe's music industry report on May 10, 2023 states that they will drop the 'New' in "뉴아르" (New Jeans, Illit, Le Seraphim) is interpreted as a plan to drop New Jeans and start over.
Ador
The '아' in "뉴아르" is not Illit, but Ive. At the time the document was written, Illit had not even debuted. It started from a clear misunderstanding of facts. The opinion was that it would be better to avoid categorizing News Jeans and Le Sserafim and categorize them with other girl groups (Blackpink, Aespa, Ive).
NJZ
Isn't there a plan to somehow exclude New Jeans from the category of representative 4th generation girl groups and include Le Sserafim? In fact, they launched Illit that imitated New Jeans and implemented a plan to damage and replace the New Jeans brand value.
Ador
The author is not the decision maker and this is just a personal opinion, not a decision-making document at the Hybe level. On October 24, 2024, 1 year and 5 months after the report was written, someone read the report more than 7 times. The person who read it was MHJ. I would like to ask whether it is not a bigger problem to maliciously edit and distort the meaning.
3. 1.02 million copies
NJZ
Regarding the performance of New Jeans' album, Hybe Enterprise PR Team Manager Cho○○ called a reporter from a media outlet and disparaged the performance, saying, "New Jeans didn't do well in Japan. It was worse than expected."
Ador
It was a statement to correct the facts. It was not '1.02 million in Japan', but '1.02 million in Japan and other countries'. Not correcting the facts could actually be a violation of the Capital Markets Act.
NJZ
Director Cho○○ even made personally insulting remarks to members, saying, "New Jeans was gaslighted."
Ador
In the entertainment industry, it was just a statement that if an artist becomes mentally dependent on the producer, it can lead to a breach of trust. There was no intention to personally insult him. The bigger problem is that the context was deleted and only the words were used to distort the meaning. (Of course, the employee in question was given a warning and excluded from PR work.)
NJZ
Regarding the performance of New Jeans' album, Hybe Enterprise PR Team Manager Cho○○ called a reporter from a media outlet and disparaged the performance, saying, "New Jeans didn't do well in Japan. It was worse than expected."
Ador
It was a statement to correct the facts. It was not '1.02 million in Japan', but '1.02 million in Japan and other countries'. Not correcting the facts could actually be a violation of the Capital Markets Act.
NJZ
Director Cho○○ even made personally insulting remarks to members, saying, "New Jeans was gaslighted."
Ador
In the entertainment industry, it was just a statement that if an artist becomes mentally dependent on the producer, it can lead to a breach of trust. There was no intention to personally insult him. The bigger problem is that the context was deleted and only the words were used to distort the meaning. (Of course, the employee in question was given a warning and excluded from PR work.)
4. Similarity
NJZ
Illit launched by copying New Jeans. It is Hybe's intention to damage the New Jeans brand value and try to replace it. For example, they copied New Jeans' plan. There was even a report from an internal employee of Hybe saying, "We saw and referenced all of this, so why do you keep saying no?"
Ador
Although the format of the plan used within Hive may be similar, there are differences in the content. The plan contains content that differentiates it from other groups, including New Jeans. There are also differences in the brand core concept.
NJZ
It is unprecedented to release a group's own pictorial during the holidays. Illit's pictorial is similar to New Jeans in terms of composition, location, concept, color, and texture. If you look at the photos, it is hard to tell who is Illit and who is New Jeans. The way they appeared at official events is also similar. Illit followed the method of signing an ambassador contract with a brand before debuting and making their faces known to the public. The choreography is also similar. This is something that the public first pointed out.
Ador
The very meaning of asking to keep the color of New Jeans is unclear. It is an abstract and ambiguous request. MHJ also said, "Plagiarism is ambiguous." Whenever a new group appears, issues of similarity and benchmarking often arise. Should we call all of them plagiarism of New Jeans?
NJZ
Illit launched by copying New Jeans. It is Hybe's intention to damage the New Jeans brand value and try to replace it. For example, they copied New Jeans' plan. There was even a report from an internal employee of Hybe saying, "We saw and referenced all of this, so why do you keep saying no?"
Ador
Although the format of the plan used within Hive may be similar, there are differences in the content. The plan contains content that differentiates it from other groups, including New Jeans. There are also differences in the brand core concept.
NJZ
It is unprecedented to release a group's own pictorial during the holidays. Illit's pictorial is similar to New Jeans in terms of composition, location, concept, color, and texture. If you look at the photos, it is hard to tell who is Illit and who is New Jeans. The way they appeared at official events is also similar. Illit followed the method of signing an ambassador contract with a brand before debuting and making their faces known to the public. The choreography is also similar. This is something that the public first pointed out.
Ador
The very meaning of asking to keep the color of New Jeans is unclear. It is an abstract and ambiguous request. MHJ also said, "Plagiarism is ambiguous." Whenever a new group appears, issues of similarity and benchmarking often arise. Should we call all of them plagiarism of New Jeans?
5. Trainee Videos
NJZ
The video released by Dispatch includes footage from her trainee days, and was published without her consent. The leaker must have been Hybe or Source Music. This is an illegal act that infringes on New Jeans’ portrait rights. MHJ stated that she would respond strongly to Source Music, but Kim Joo-young and others did not seek any countermeasures. They had no intention or will to protect New Jeans.
Ador
We requested Dispatch to delete the videos more than three times. In fact, two news videos were deleted. Faces were blurred in the captured photos. About 200 videos other than Dispatch were also deleted. We took numerous measures to protect News Jeans.
NJZ
The video released by Dispatch includes footage from her trainee days, and was published without her consent. The leaker must have been Hybe or Source Music. This is an illegal act that infringes on New Jeans’ portrait rights. MHJ stated that she would respond strongly to Source Music, but Kim Joo-young and others did not seek any countermeasures. They had no intention or will to protect New Jeans.
Ador
We requested Dispatch to delete the videos more than three times. In fact, two news videos were deleted. Faces were blurred in the captured photos. About 200 videos other than Dispatch were also deleted. We took numerous measures to protect News Jeans.
I will post the next 5 parts in part 2.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2019
- Posts
- 71,841
- Reaction score
- 31,065
- Points
- 110,120
- Location
- REPUBLIC OF UMJI
- Plus Coins
- ⨭61,801,163
Video still available on Dispatch ig.5. Trainee Videos
NJZ
The video released by Dispatch includes footage from her trainee days, and was published without her consent. The leaker must have been Hybe or Source Music. This is an illegal act that infringes on New Jeans’ portrait rights. MHJ stated that she would respond strongly to Source Music, but Kim Joo-young and others did not seek any countermeasures. They had no intention or will to protect New Jeans.
Ador
We requested Dispatch to delete the videos more than three times. In fact, two news videos were deleted. Faces were blurred in the captured photos. About 200 videos other than Dispatch were also deleted. We took numerous measures to protect News Jean
SirTim0thy
🦋 Karma Butterfly 🦋Kinda wishing Illit's name would have been left out of all this chaos...
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2023
- Posts
- 2,484
- Reaction score
- 3,040
- Points
- 12,220
- Location
- Kwangya
- Plus Coins
- ⨭3,290,650
- Pronouns
- She/Her
Ador said they were only able to get 2/3 videos down so that might be the 3rd one.Video still available on Dispatch ig.
If the video is on Instagram both Ador and NJZ should be able to easily contact Instagram to get it taken down cause that being posted without consent is a violation, so I don’t understand that?

At the very least if bunnies band together and mass report it insta should have it down in a day.