Can BigHit replace YG as one of the big 3?

[GuardianofTheCosmicRealm]

Assuming the merging rumours of Source Music is true.

 

[emily]

they certainly have plans with that big ass building

 

[Aquamaraqua]

They, unlike the B3, are smart. I wouldn't be surprised. BH is the strongest company when it comes to plans. And I don't stan any of their groups, so this is an outsider perspective. If they can keep it up with multiple groups, they will certainly pose an even larger threat. Which is healthy since industries aren't meant to be monopolized if we want to remain an ounce of sane anyway.

 

[Midcara]

Not really sure as they still don't have many successful groups/entertainers to equate to the level of what YG was or what SM and JYP are. But I guess at the moment they are the 4th best company in terms of music? So maybe. If all goes well with their possible mergers and they don't become too ambitious so that they can't keep up the same quality they have now.

 

[TT95]

I would like to see how well they do as a whole when members begin to enlist before giving an opinion since BTS is hard carrying the company and to see how txt does with their comeback as well. With the merge though since they will acquire GF - maybe? It's definitely a wait and see type of thing.

 

[Astro]

I was told the big 3 was the nickname for Sm, jyp, & yg and that it won’t change

 

[Belkiss]

in terms of sales and revenues, they already surpassed Big3 but in terms of legacy and history, they're still far behind
Give it a decade and a couple of successful groups and they can lead the future of kpop
As for me Idc, i just want a decent company that treats the groups right and BH is doing a good job so far
and please stay away from the illegal world

 

[Yeddong]

Again with this?

 

[munyuna]

No girlgroup, no big3

 

[daicakes]

If they debut a ggroup, then maybe yes.

But we have to remember the situation that BH has with ggroups. If the Source Music news are true then they'll have Gfriend under them, i guess?? Idk if that's correct.​

 

[Po'etry]

Now that they have Source as a sub-label: Definitely

 

[Pyron]

In practical terms yes. Just stay on the smart course and focus on their core business instead of spread on weird ventures.

 

[kulakuli]

I would like to see that happen for the meltdowns