- Joined
- Dec 10, 2023
- Posts
- 2,668
- Reaction score
- 3,193
- Points
- 15,220
- Location
- Kwangya
- Plus Coins
- ⨭3,453,450
- Pronouns
- She/Her
I literally just said in the random thoughts thread that watch the court ruling news drop right as i'm about to go to bed and look at where we are now


In the first trial of Ador VS NJZ the court has ruled in favor of ADOR.
Until there is a final ruling on the second court case in April the courts have ruled in favor of ADOR in regards to their injunction.
The five NJZ members are forbidden from doing any independent activities. This includes ADOR's request to expand the injunction to forbid all entertainment activities including singing, songwriting, writing lyrics, composing, etc.
Article Source
Until there is a final ruling on the second court case in April the courts have ruled in favor of ADOR in regards to their injunction.
The five NJZ members are forbidden from doing any independent activities. This includes ADOR's request to expand the injunction to forbid all entertainment activities including singing, songwriting, writing lyrics, composing, etc.
Article Source
Dispatch is releasing additional info on this, such as NJZ is now responsible for paying ADOR's legal fees for this trial though this is also dispatch so i'm taking this with a grain of salt. No other source article i'm finding says this and this is dispatch after all

*I am updating this with the recent statements and info from an additional article that was released*
NJZ Statement
NJZ Statement
“Today, the court issued a preliminary injunction. While we at NJZ respect the court's decision, we believe that it fails to take into account the complete loss of trust our members have placed in ADOR. Due to the fast-paced nature of the conservation proceedings, the decision was issued only about two weeks after the hearing date of March 7, 2025, which did not provide sufficient opportunity to present all of the specific facts to the court. Furthermore, due to the asymmetry of information, ADOR and HYBE have all the information about the members' entertainment activities, while the members have to contact the relevant people one by one to request information. Many people are reluctant to cooperate because of the pressure and fear of retaliation that comes with being involved in this lawsuit.
We plan to appeal today's preliminary injunction decision, and we plan to argue additional issues through the appeals process, supplementing our arguments as much as possible. Above all, until the time of the termination of the exclusive contract, the members have been faithfully fulfilling the contract and have not committed any wrongdoing, while ADOR and HYBE behind it have consistently treated the members discriminatorily and unfairly, destroying trust, so it is only a matter of time and the truth will soon become clear.
The preliminary injunction is a provisional decision.
There is also an ongoing main proceeding between ADOR and the members to determine the validity of the exclusivity agreement, and we will reiterate that the agreement was lawfully terminated at the hearing date scheduled for April 3. Unlike the preliminary injunction proceeding, the main proceeding allows for greater freedom to utilize the civil procedure system to obtain the necessary evidence, so we expect that the evidence supporting the members' claims will be greatly strengthened.
The members of NJZ are going through a difficult time, but they are trying to overcome this situation with determination and calmness, thinking of the many people who have been supporting NJZ as they have been. NJZ's commitment to the fans is paramount, and we will continue to do everything in our power to communicate with them in a way that makes them happy. As we've said many times before, we reiterate that we cannot be associated with an agency that has insulted our character and defamed us, regardless of the financial implications. The reason we are pursuing this lawsuit is to defend our values and human rights.
Meanwhile, we have decided to participate in the Complex concert scheduled for March 23rd after much consideration to prevent any damage to the fans who are looking forward to the concert and to the many people involved.
Please keep an eye on us in the future and give us your support.”
“Hello, this is ADOR.
We are deeply grateful for the preliminary injunction court's wise decision.
Since ADOR has been legally confirmed as NewJeans’ company, we will take full responsibility for supporting our artists in the future.
We will also provide extensive on-site support so that this weekend's ComplexCon performance will be held under the name of ‘NewJeans’.
We look forward to meeting the artists and having a heart-to-heart conversation with them as soon as possible.
We sincerely ask that you send your warm support and encouragement to NewJeans, which will grow again together with ADOR
Thank you.”
Points from court case
A second article came out explaining the reasons why NJZ's claims got rejected.
Overall the court did not accept any of the reasons from NJZ for a termination of contract.
I will post a summary of the reasons NJZ listed as a reason for contract termination and the court's response to it (the text in the quote).
*The original article refers to them as "the creditor" and "the debtor" but in order to make things easier to read/understand i'm changing the names to "Ador" and "NJZ". I hope that helps?*
NJZ claim that trust is broken and this is a reason for contract termination:
A second article came out explaining the reasons why NJZ's claims got rejected.
Overall the court did not accept any of the reasons from NJZ for a termination of contract.
I will post a summary of the reasons NJZ listed as a reason for contract termination and the court's response to it (the text in the quote).
*The original article refers to them as "the creditor" and "the debtor" but in order to make things easier to read/understand i'm changing the names to "Ador" and "NJZ". I hope that helps?*
NJZ claim that trust is broken and this is a reason for contract termination:
"It is difficult to see how it has been sufficiently proven based on the claims and materials submitted so far by the debtor (New Jeans) that the creditor (Ador) violated an important obligation under the exclusive contract, resulting in the termination of the exclusive contract, or that the mutual trust that formed the foundation of the exclusive contract was irreparably damaged as a result.
MHJ's dismissal being a reason for a breach of their contract:
It is a matter of the Ador's management judgment and has no direct relation to the producing work for NJZ. It is difficult to see that there was a clause in the exclusive contract that Min Hee-jin must take charge of the producing work, or that that was the motive or purpose for signing the exclusive contract.
NJZ claim that them breaking their contract with the Dolphiners is a reason for breach of contract:
It is difficult to see that Ador violated an important obligation under the exclusive contract simply because there was a dispute between Dolphiners Group, which was not a party to the incident.
NJZ's claim that Illit's plagiarism and Hanni's "Ignore her" situation is a reason for breach of contract:
The court ruled that Hanni did not sufficiently prove her case.
The court ruled that Hanni did not sufficiently prove her case.
It is difficult to conclude that Hanni actually heard these (disrespectful) remarks. Considering that on the same day, Hanni sent an English KakaoTalk message to Min Hee-jin to the effect that the three members of Illit greeted Hanni, the debtor, in an uncomfortable and stiff manner, it appears that they did greet her. In addition, the three members of Illit were seen bowing on Hive’s closed-circuit ( CC ) TV at the time , so it has not been sufficiently proven that Hanni heard remarks that were to the extent of violating her personal rights.”
Ador has fulfilled most of the important obligations under the exclusive contract, such as the obligation to settle accounts, to NJZ. It seems that Ador was unable to perform management duties under the exclusive contract due to the NJZ's unilateral notice of termination of the exclusive contract. Even if there were some shortcomings in fulfilling the obligations under the exclusive contract, it is difficult to conclude that the relationship of trust has been broken to the extent that it has not been confirmed that no corrections were made despite the debtor's request for correction, or that the violation of obligations was repeated or continued for a long period of time.
Additional comment:
Ador has taken on a very high risk of failure and has provided full support and effort for a long time, and even invested a large amount of money, for the successful entertainment activities of the NJZ who were then unknown trainees. If NJZ, who have successfully gained popularity after their debut, unilaterally depart from the exclusive contract relationship after only two years, Ador will suffer enormous losses.
The overall verdict is that as of right now NJZ has no grounds/valid reasons for contract termination.
Article Source
Article source for Hanni's ignore me comment.
Last edited: